School Well Being Siswa Kota Jambi

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36565/jab.v10i2.416

Keywords:

program, school well-being, student

Abstract

This study aims to describe the indicators of a school well-being program in Jambi City. This research was conducted with an open survey method (open ended questionnaire), the analysis was carried out by categorization, axial coding, percentage, and a description of each category. The sampling technique is random sampling. This study included 239 high school students in Jambi City as respondents. The results showed that the indicators of a school well-being consisted of school conditions (having), social relations (loving), school self-fulfillment (being), and health status had been achieved even though in each component there was still unsatisfactory achievement indicator status. The main priority in realizing the development of a school well-being program in Jambi City includes planning to prepare relaxing facilities according to student needs, the role of teachers, constructive collaboration between teachers and parents, and strengthening physical and psychological health services. The implementation of the welfare school program is the responsibility of schools and stakeholders so that it is necessary to prepare for strengthening policies in governance, long-term plans, sources of funds, implementation, and supervision from local, provincial, and even Ministry level agencies

References

Barret, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D., & Ustinova, M. (2018). The Impact of School Infrastructure on Learning.

Cuyvers, K., De Weerd, G., Dupont, S., Mols, S., & Nuytten, C. (2011). Well-Being at School: Does Infrastructure Matter?. CELE Exchange.

Fadzlul, S., Saputra, N., Ekawati, Y., & Periantalo, J. (2016). Identifikasi Faktor Protektif Dan Resiko Pada Siswa Di Kota Jambi. Jurnal Psikologi Jambi, 1(1), 1–9.

Fatmawati, S. (2018). Implementasi Program Sekolah Sejahtera Di SMA Negeri 1 Godean the Implementation of the School Well-Being Program in Sma Negeri. JUrnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 4, 201–211.

Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.192.21858

Hidayah, N. H., Pali, M., Ramli, M., & Hanurawan, F. (2016). Students’ Well-Being Assessment at School. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 5(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v5i1.6257

Jessor, R. (1993). Succesful adolescent development among youth in high-risk settings. American Psychological Association, 48(2), 117–126.

Keyes, C. L. M., & Waterman, M. B. (2008). Dimensions of well-being and mental health in adulthood. Dalam Marc H. Bornstein, dkk. (Ed), WellBeing: Positive development across the life course. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

Khatimah, H. (2015). Gambaran School Well-Being pada Peserta Didik Program Kelas Akselerasi di SMA Negeri 8 Yogyakarta. PSIKOPEDAGOGIA Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.12928/psikopedagogia.v4i1.4485

Konu, A. I., & Lintonen, T. P. (2006). School well-being in Grades 4-12. Health Education Research, 21(5), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl032

Konu, A., & Rimpelä, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: A conceptual model. Health Promotion International, 17(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/17.1.79

Kuusimäki, A. M., Uusitalo-Malmivaara, L., & Tirri, K. (2019). The Role of Digital School-Home Communication in Teacher Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(November), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02257

Laho, N. (2019). Enhancing School-Home Communication through Learning Management System Adoption: Parent and Teacher Perceptions and Practices. School Community Journal, 29(1), 117–142.

Lohmeier, J. H., & Lee, S. W. (2011). A school connectedness scale for use with adolescents. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2011.597108

McLaughlin, C. (2008). Emotional well-being and its relationship to schools and classrooms: A critical reflection. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 36(4), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880802364486

Muis, T. (2017). Tindakan Kekerasan Guru Terhadap Siswa dalam Interaksi Belajar Mengajar (Studi Kasus di SMAN Surabaya). Jurnal Pendidikan (Teori Dan Praktik), 2(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v2n1.p86-90

Owoeye, J. S., & Yara, P. O. (2011). School facilities and academic achievement of secondary school agricultural science in Ekiti state, Nigeria. Asian Social Science, 7(7), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n7p64

Palt, K., & Harro-Loit, H. (2015). Parent-teacher communication patterns concerning activity and positive-negative attitudes. Trames, 19(3), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2015.2.03

Supriatna, M. (2017). Efektivitas model konseling aktualisasi diri untuk mengembangkan kecakapan pribadi. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Dan Konseling: Jurnal Kajian Psikologi Pendidikan Dan Bimbingan Konseling, 3, 11. https://doi.org/10.26858/jpkk.v0i0.2973

Zulfiqar, A., Syed, F. R., & Latif, F. F. (2019). Developing a student well-being model for schools in Pakistan. Improving Schools, 22(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480218794755

Downloads

Published

2021-09-18

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): September

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).